文献－２０００－

(1)Albert,M.K. 1999 Surface formation and depth in monocular scene perception. Perception,28,1347-1360.
(2)Allison,R.S. & Howard,I.P. 2000 Temporal dependencies in resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception. Vision Research,40,1869-1886.
(3)Bradshaw,M.F.,Andrew,D.P. & Glennerster,A The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information.
VisionResearch,40,3725-3734.
(4)Bross,M. 2000 Emmert's law in the dark:active and passive proprioceptive effects on positive visual afterimages. Perception,29,1385-1391.
(5)Edwards,M. & Shor,C.M. 1999 Depth aliasing by the transient-steropsis system. Vision Research,39,4333-4340.
(6)Ee,van E. & Erkelens,C.J. 2000 Is there an interaction between perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereoscopic vision. Perception & Psychophysics,62,910-926.
(7)Grove,P.M. & Ono,H. 1999ﾊ Ecologicallyﾊ invalidﾊ monocular texture leads to longer perceptual latencies in random-dot stereogram. Perception,28,627-639.
(8)Hogervorst,M.A.,Bradshaw,M.F. & Eagle,R.A. 2000 Spatial frequency tuning for 　3-D corrugations from motion parallax. Vision Research, 40,2149-2158.
(9)He,Z.J. & Ooi,T.L. 2000 Perceiving binocular depth with reference to a common surface.ﾊ Perception,29, 1313-1334.
(10)Kham,K.&Blake R.2000 Depth captures by kinetic depth and by stereopsis.Perception,29,211-220.ﾊﾊﾊ
(11)Kontsevich,L.L. & Tyler,C.W. 2000 Relative contributions of sustained and trtansient pathways to human stereoprcessing. Vision Research,40,3245-3255.
(12)Morgan,M.J.& Fahle,M. 2000 Motion-stereo mechanisms sensitive to inter-ocular phase. Vision Research,40,1667-1675.
(13)Ninio,J. 2000 Curvature biases in stereoscopic vision: A nasotemporal asymmetry. Perception,29,1219-1230.
(14)O'Brien,J. & Johnston,A. 2000 When texture takes precedence over motion indepth perception. Perception,29,437-452.ﾊﾊ
(15)Ono,H.,Shimono,K. Saida,S. & Ujike,H. 2000 Transformation of the visual-line value in binocular vision: Stimuli on corresponding points can be seen in two different directions. Perception,29,2000,421-436.
(16)Phinney,R.E. & Siegel,R.M. 1999 Stored representation of three-dimensional objects in the absense of two-dimensional cues. Perception,28,725-737.
(17)Pope,D.R.,Edwards,M. & Schor,C.F. 1999 Extraction of depth from opposite-contrast stimuli:transient systemcan, sustained can't. Vision
Research,39,4010-4017.
(18)Prince,S.J.D. & Wagle,R.A. 2000 Stereo correspndence in one-dimensional Gabor stimuli. Vision Research,40,913-954.
(19)Read,J.C.A. & Eagle,R.A. 2000 Received stereo depth and motion direction with anti-correlated stimuli. Vision Research, 40,3345-3358.
(20)Shimono,K.,Tam,W.J. & Nakamizo,S. Wheatstone-Panum limiting case: Occlusion, camfoulage, and vergence-induced disparity cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 61,445-455.
(21)Skiera,G.,Petersen,D.,Skalej,M. & Fahle,M. 2000 Correlates of figure-ground segregation in fMRI. Vision Research, 40,2047-2056.ﾊ
(22)Takeuchi,H. 1999 The effects of stereoscopic depth on completion.
Perception & Psychophysics, 61,144-150.
(23)Todd,J.T. & Perotti,V. 1999 The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics,61,1577-1589.ﾊ
(24)Tsai,J.J. & Victor,J.D. 2000 Neither occlusion constraint nor binoculardisparity accounts for the perceived depth in the 'sieve effect'. Vision Research, 40, 2265-2276.
(25)Watanabe,H.,Pollick,F.E.,Koenderink,J.J. & Kawato,M. 1999 Using motor tasks to quantitatively judge 3-D surface curvatures. Perception & Psychophysics,61,1116-1139.
(26)Yang,T. & Kubovy,M. 1999 Weakening the robustness of perspective:Evidence for a modified theory of compensation in picture perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 61,456-467.
(27)Yin,C.,Kellman,P.J. & Shipley,T.F. 2000 Surface integration influences depth discrimination. Vision Research,40,1969-1978.
(28)Ziegler,L.R.,Hess,R.F. & Kingdom,F.A.A. 2000 Global factors that determine the maximum disparity for seeing cyclopean surface shape. Vision Research,40,493-502.