@
(1)Bertamini,M.B., Jones,L.A., Spooner,A. & Hecht,H. 2005 Boundary
extension: the role of magnification, object size, context, and binocular
information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfrmance,
31, 1288-1307.
(2)Bingushi,K & Yukumatsu,S. Disappearance of a monocular image in Panumfs limiting case. Japanese Psychological Research, 47,223-229.
(3)Burke,D. 2005 Combining disparate views of objects: Viewpoint costs are reduced by stereopsis. Visual Cognition, 12, 705-719.
(4)Delicato,L.S. & Qian.N. 2005 Is depth perception of stereo plaids predicted by intersection of constraints, vector average or second-order feature? Vision research, 45, 75-89.
(5)Duke,P ,A.& Howard,I.P. 2005 Vertical-disparity gradients are processed independently in different depth planes. Vision research, 45, 2025-2035.
(6)Forti, S. & Humpreys, G.W. 2005 Cross-modal visuo-tactile matching in a patient with a semantic disorder. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1568-1579.
(7)Gheorghiu,E. & Erkelens,C. 2005 Temporal properties of disparity processing revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms. Perception, 34, 1205-1219.
(8)Goutcher,R. & Mamassian,P. 2005 Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereoguram. Vision Research, 45, 469-483.
(9)Ito,H. 2005 Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity. Vision Research, 45, 931-942.
(10)Ito,H. & Shibata,I. 2005 Self-motion perception from expanding and contracting optical flows pverlapped with binocular disparity. Vision Research, 45, 397-402.
(11)Kellman,O.J., Garrigan,P.K. & Shipley,T.F. 2005 Object interpolation in three dimensions. Psychological Review, 112, 586-609.
(12)Mitsuda,H.,Nakamizo,S. & Ono,H. 2005 Greater depth seen with phantom stereopsis is coded at the early stages of visual processing. Vision Research, 45, 1365-1374.
(13)Naganuma, T.,Nose,I.,Inoue,K.,Takemoto,A.,Katsuyama,N. & Taira,M. 2005 Information processing of geometrical features of a surface based on binocular disparity cues: an fMRI study. Neuroscience, 51,147-155.
(14)Neri,P. 2005 A stereoscopic look at visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1823-1826
(15)Ono,H. & Ujike,H. 2005 Motion parallax driven by head movement: Conditions for visual stability, perceived depth, and perceived concomitant motion. Perception, 34, 477-490.
(16)Picard,D. & Durand, K. 2005 Are young childrenfs drawings canonically biased ? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 48-64.
(17)Pizlo,Z. & Li,Y.& Francis,G. 2005 A new look at binocular stereopsis. Vision Research, 45, 2244-2255.
(18)Sakai,K., Ogiya,M. & Hirai,Y. Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information. Vision Research, 45,2471-2480.
(19)Shimono,K. & Egusa,H. 2005 The effect of binocular eye position on stereopsis with double images. Japanese Psychological Research, 47,188-195.
(20)Tsai,J.J. & Victor,J.D. 2005 Binocular depth perception from unpaired image points need not depend on scene organization. Vision Research, 45, 527-532.
(21)Welchman,A.E.,Deubelius,A.D.,Conrad,V.,Bulthoff,H.H. & Kourtzi,Z. 2005 3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 820-827.