•ΆŒ£

[1]Bradshaw,M.F. & Gkennerster,A. 2006 Stereoscopic acuity and observation distance. Spatial Vision, 19, 21-36.

[2]Brooks,K.R. & Gillam,B.J. 2006 Quanttitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamfoulage. Vision Research, 46, 605-613.

[3]Bruggeman,H.,Yonas,A. & Konczak,J. 2006 The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for action and perception. Neuropsychlogia, 45, 1420-1426.

[4]Da Silva,J.A.,Matsushima,E.H.,Aznar-Casanova,J.A. & Ribeiro-Filho,N.P. 2006 Distance perception in a natural outdoor setting:is there a development trend to overconstancy? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9, 285-294.

[6]Fagot,J.,Barbet,I. & Parron,C. 2006 Amodal completion by baboons(Papio papio): contribution of background depth cues. Primates, 47, 145-150.

[7]Farell,B. Orientation-specific computation in stereoscopic vision. Journal Neuroscience, 26, 9098-9106.

[8]Grove,P.M.,Ben Sachtler,W.L. & Gillam,B.J. Amodal comletion with background determines depth from monocular gap stereopsis. Vision Research, 46, 3771-3774.

[9]Hale,K.S. & Stanney,K.M. 2006 Effects of low stereo acuity on performance, presence and sickness within a virtual environment.Applied Ergonomics, (37) 329-339.

[10]Hou,F., Lu,H., Zhou,Y. & Liu,Z. 2006 Amodal completion impairs stereoacuity discrimination. Vision Research, 246, 2061-2068.

[11]Howe,P.D. & Livingstone,M.S. 2006 V1 partially solves the stereo aperture problems. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1332-1337.

[12]Ishikawa,H. & Geiger,D. 2006 Illusory volumes in human stereo perception. Vision Research, 46, 171-178.

[15]Kuroki,D. & Nakamizo,S. 2006 Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereogurams using absolute distance information. Vision Research, 46, 4206-4216.

[16]Lappin,J.S., Shelton,A.L. & Rieser,J.J. 2006 Enviromental context influences visually perceived distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 571-581.

[17]Lee,H.S. & Dobbins,A.C. 2006 Perceiving surfaces in depth beyond the fusion limit of their elements. Perception, 35, 31-39.

[18]Makino,Y. & Yano,M 2006 Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis. Vision Research, 46, 91-105.

[19]Palmisano,S.,Allison,R.S. & Howard,I.P. 2006 effects of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms. Vision Research,46, 57-71.

[20]Patel,S.S.,Bedell,H.E. & Sampat,P. 2006 Pooling signals from vertical and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis. Vision Research, 46, 1-13.

[21]Tanaka,H. & Ohzawa,I. 2006 Neural basis for stereopsis from second-order contrast cues. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4370-4382.

[22]Tozawa,J. & Oyama,T. 2006 Effects of motion parallax and perspective cues on perceived size and distance. Perception, 35, 1007-1023.

[25]Uka,T. & DeAngelis, G.C. 2006 Linking neural representation to function in stereoscopic depth perception: Rloes of the middle temporal area in coarse versus fine disparity discrimination. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6791-6802.

[26]Yonas, A. & Granrud, C.E. 2006 Infantsf perception of depth from cast shadows. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 154-160.

[27]Bertin E. & Bhatt,R. 2006 Three-month-oldsf sensitivity to orientation cues in the three-dimensional depth plane. Journal of experimental Child Psychology, 93, 45-62.

[28]Buckthought,A. & Stelmach,L,B.2006 Stereoscopic depth discrimination with contrast windowed stimuli.Vision Research, 46, 3090-3097.

[29] Norman, J.F., Crabtree,C.E., Norman,H.F., Moncrief,B.K., Herrmann, M. &  Kapley,N. 2006