文献（２００９）

[1] Baker,D.H. & Graf,E.W. 2009 On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 49, 451-459.

[2] Cecchetto,S. & Kramer,P. 2010 Forcing free fusion of stereograms. Perception, 39, 133-135.

[3] Farell,B., Chai,Yu-C. & Fernandez,J.M. 2009 Projected disparity, not horizontal disparity, predicts stereo depth of 1-D patterns. Vision Research, 49, 2209-2216.

[4] Farran, E.K.,Whitaker,A. & Patel,N. 2009 The effect of pictorial depth information  on projected size judgments. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,71,207-214.

[5] Francis,G. 2009 Cortical dynamics of figure-ground segmentation: Shine-through. Vision Research, 49, 140-163.

[6] Freeman,A.W. & Li,D. 2009 Conditions required for binocular rivalry suppression. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 174-182.

[7] Georgeson,M.A. Tates,T.A. & Schofield, A.J. 2009 Depth propagation and surface construction in 3-D vision. Vision Research, 49, 84-95.

[8] Hariharan-Vilupuru,S. & Bedell,H.E. 2009 The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Vision Research, 49, 190-201.

[9] Harris,J.M. & Wilcox,L.M. 2009 The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception. Vision Research, 49, 2666-2686.

[10] Ishii,M 2009 Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: Non-retinal information masks retinal information. Vision Research, 49, 1563-1568.

[11] Jones,S.A.H. & Wilson,A. 2009 The horizon line, linear perspective, interposition, and background brightness as determinants of the magnitude of the pictorial moon illusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 131-142.

[12] Li,Y.,Pizlo,Z. & Steinman,R.M. 2009 A computational model that recovers the 3D shape of an object from a single 2D retinal representation. Vision Research, 49, 979-991.

[13] Mitsudo,H.,Kaneko,H. & Nishida,S. 2009 Perceived depth of curved lines in the presence of cyclovergence. Vision Research, 49, 348-361.

[14] Muller,C.M.P, Jeroen,E.B. & Smeete, J.B.J. 2009 Testing a counter-intuitive prediction of optimal cue combination. Vision Research, 49, 134-139.

[15] Nawrot,M & Mayo,S. The development of depth perception from motion parallax in infancy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 194-199.

[16] Nawrot,M & Stroyan,K. 2009 The motion/pursuit law for visual depth perception from motion parallax. Vision Research, 49, 1969-1978.

[17] Nichols, D.F. & Wilson, H.R. 2009 Stimulus specificity in spatially-extended interocular suppression. Vision Research, 49, 2110-2120

[18] Norman,J.F., Crabtree,C., Bartholomew, A.N. & Ferrell, E.L.2009 Aging and the perception of slant from optical texture, motion parallax, and binocular disparity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 116-130.

[19] O’Shea, R.P. Parker A., Rooy, D.L. & Alais, D. 2009 Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: Evidence for common processes. Vision Research, 49, 671-681.

[20] Ozkanand,K & Braunstein,M.L. 2009 Predominance of ground over ceiling surfaces in binocular rivalry. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1305-1312.

[21] Palmer,S.E. & Schloss,K.B. 2009 Stereoscopic depth and the occlusion illusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1083-1094.

[22] Rychkova, S.I. & Ninio, J. 2009 Paradoxical fusion of two images and depth perception with a squinting eye. Vision Research, 49, 530-535.

[23] Spillmann, L. 2009 Phenomenology and neurophysiological correlations: Two approaches to perception research. Vision Research, 49, 1507-1521.

[24] Takase,S.,Yukumatsu,S. & Bingushi,K. 2009 Recovery from perceptual filling-in is gated by interocular matching. Vision Research, 49, 1909-1915.

[25] Umemura, H. & Watanabe,H. 2009 Interpretation of optic flows synchronized with observer’s hand movements. Vision Research, 49, 834-842.

[26] van der Kooij,K & te Pas,S.F. 2009 Perception of 3D shape in context: Contrast and assimilation. Vision Research, 49, 746-751.

[27] Warren,P. & Rushton,S.K. 2009 Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues. Vision Research, 49, 1406-1419.

[28] Wilcox, L. M. & Allison, R. S. 2009　Coarse-fine dichotomies in human stereopsis. Vision Research, 49, 2653–2665.

[29] Welchman,A.E., Harris,J.M. & Brenner,E. 2009 Extra-retinal signals support the estimation of 3D motion. Vision Research, 49, 782-789.

文献

Andersen, G. J., & Atchley, P. 1995 Age-related differences in the detection of three-dimensional surfaces from optic flow. Psychology & Aging, 10, 650-658.

Arterberry, M. E., & Yonas, A. 1988 Infants’ sensitivity to kinetic information for three-dimensional object shape. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 1-6.

Backus, B. T., Banks, M. S., van Ee, R., & Crowell, J. A. 1999 Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research, 39,1143–1170.

Banks, M. S.,Hooge,J.T.C & Backus,B.T. 2001 Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis. Journal of Vision, 1, 55-79.

Banks, M. S., Backus, B. T. & Banks, R. S. 2002  Is  vertical  disparity  used  to determine azimuth? Vision Research, 42, 801–807.

Berends, E. M., van Ee, R. & Erkelens, C. J. 2002 Vertical  disparity  can  alterperceived direction. Perception, 31, 1323–1333.

Bertenthal, B. I., & Bradbury, A. 1992 Infants’ detection of shearing motion in random-dot displays. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1056-1066.

Birch, E. E. 1993 Stereopsis in infants and its developmental relation to visual acuity. In K. Simons (Ed.), Early visual development: Normal and abnormal (pp. 224-236). New York: Oxford University Press.

Blake, R. & Camisa, J. 1979 On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression.   Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 315–323.

Blake, R., & Fox, R. 1974. Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687-692.

Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. 1980 What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223-231.

Brown, A. M., & Miracle, J. A. 2003 Early binocular vision in human infants: Limitations on the generality of the superposition hypothesis. Vision Research, 43, 1563-1574.

Cao, Y., & Grossberg, S. 2005 A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and 3-D surface perception: Closure and da Vinci stereopsis. Spatial Vision, 18, 515–578.

Chen, X., & He, S. 2004 Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Current Biology, 14, 1013-1017.

Collins, J. F., & Blackwell, L. K. 1974 Effects of eye dominance and retinal distance on binocular rivalry. Perception and Motion Skills, 39, 747–754.

Craton, L. G., & Yonas, A. 1988 Infants’ sensitivity to boundary flow information for depth at an edge. Child Development, 59, 1522-1529.

Curran, W. & Johnston, A. 1996 Three dimensional curvature contrast-geometric or brightness illusion? Vision Research, 36, 3641–3653.

De Weerd, P. 2006 Perceptual filling-in: More than the eye can see. Progress in Brain Research, 154, 227–245.

Engel, E. 1956 The role of content in binocular resolution, American Journal of Psychology, 69, 87–91

Erkelens, C. J. & Collewijn, H. 1985 Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vision Research, 25, 583–588.

Erkelens, C. J. & van Ee, R. 1997a Capture of visual direction: An unexpected phenomenon in binocular vision. Vision Research, 37, 1193–1196.

Erkelens, C. J. & van Ee, R. 1997b Capture of the visual direction of monocular objects by adjacent binocular objects. Vision Research, 37, 1735–1745.

Farell, B. 1998. Two-dimensional matches from one-dimensional stimulus cmponents in human stereopsis. Nature, 395, 689–693.

Fox, R., Aslin, R. N., Shea, S. L., & Dumais, S. T. 1980 Stereopsis in human infants. Science, 207, 323-324.

Frisby,　J. P. 1984 An  old  illusion  and  a  new  theory  of  stereoscopic  depthperception. Nature, 307, 592–593.

Forte, J., Peirce, J. W., & Lennie, P. 2002. Binocular integration of partially occludedSurfaces. Vision Research, 42, 1225–1235.

Fox, R. & Check, R. 1972 Independence between binocular rivalry suppression  duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93,283–289.

Gillam, B. & Lawergren, B. 1983  The  induced  effect,  vertical  disparity,  and　stereoscopic theory. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 121–130.

Grossberg, S. 1997  Cortical   dynamics   of   three-dimensional   figure-groundperception of two-dimensional figures. Psychological Review, 104, 618–658.

Grossberg, S. & Howe, P. D. L. 2003 A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and three-dimensional surface perception. Vision Research, 43, 801–829.

Grossberg, S., Kuhlmann, L., & Mingolla, E. 2007 A neural model of 3D shape-from-texture: Multiple-scale filtering, boundary grouping, and surface filling-in. Vision Research, 47, 634–672.

Granrud, C. E., Yonas, A., & Opland, E. A. 1985 Infants’ sensi-tivity to the depth cue of shading. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 415-419.

Haynes, J.-D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496-499.

Held, R., Gwiazda, J., Brill, S., Mohindra, I., & Wolfe, J. 1979 Infant visual acuity is underestimated because near threshold gratings are not preferentially fixated. Vision Research, 19, 1377-1379.

Hermens, F. & Herzog, M. H. 2007 The effects of the global structure of the mask in visual backward masking. Vision Research, 47, 1790–1797.

Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S. & Banks, M. S. 2004. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12), 967–992.

Hollins,  M.,  &  Bailey,  G.  W. 1981  Rivalry  target  luminance  does  not  affect suppression depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 201–203.

Howard,I. P. 1995. Depth  from  binocular  rivalry  without  spatial  disparity. Perception, 24, 67–74.

Howard, I. P. 2002 Seeing in depth. I Porteous Press.

Ito, H. 2005 Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity. Vision Research, 45, 931–942.

Julesz, B. 1971 Foundations of cyclopean perception. University of Chicago Press.

Kanizsa, G. 1979 Organization in vision: Essays on Gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.

Kaye, M. 1978 Stereopsis  without  binocular  correlation.  Vision  Research,  18,1013–1022.

Kellman, P. J. 1984 Perception of three-dimensional form by human infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 353-358.

Kellman, P. J. & Kaiser, M. K. 1995 Extracting object motion during observer motion: Combining constraints from optic flow and binocular disparity. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 12, 623–625.

Kellman,  P.  J.,  &  Short,  K.  R.  1987  Development  of  three-dimensional form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 545-557.

Kertesz, A. E. & Sullivan, M. J. 1978 The  effect  of  stimulus  size  on  humancyclofusional response. Vision Research, 18, 567–571.

Komatsu, H. 2006 The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in. Nature ReviewsNeuroscience, 7, 220–231.

Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B. & Young, M. 1995 Measurement andmodeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research,35(3), 389–412.

Liu, B., Berends, E. M. & Schor, C. M. 2005 Adaptation  to  the  induced  effectstimulus  normalizes  surface  slant  perception  and  recalibrates  eye  position signals for azimuth. Journal of Vision, 5, 808–822.

Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. 1996 Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys’ percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.

Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. 1996 What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.

Mitsudo, H. 2007 Illusory depth induced by binocular torsional misalignment.Vision Research, 47, 1303–1314.

Morgan, M. & Castet, J.  E. 1997  The  aperture  problem  in  stereopsis.  Vision Research, 39, 2737–2744.

Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. 1990 da Vinci  stereopsis:  Depth  and  subjectiveoccluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research, 30, 1811–1825.

Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Wenderoth, P. 2001 The depth and selectivity  of  suppression  in  binocular  rivalry.  Perception  & Psychophysics, 63, 348-360.

Norman, J. F., Crabtree, C. E., Herrmann, M., Thompson, S. R., Shular, C. F., & Clayton, A. M. 2006 Aging and the perception of 3-D shape from dynamic patterns of binocular disparity. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 94-101.

Norman, J. F., Dawson, T. E., & Butler, A. K. 2000 The effects of age upon the perception of depth and 3-D shape from differential motion and binocular disparity. Perception, 29, 1335-1359.

Norman, H. F., Norman, J. F., & Bilotta, J. 2000 The temporal course of suppressionduring binocular rivalry. Perception, 29, 831–841.

Norman, J. F., Norman, H. F., Craft, A. E., Walton, C. L., Bartholomew, A. N., Burton, C. L., et al. 2008 Stereopsis and aging. Vision Research, 48, 2456-2465.

Norman, J. F., Ross, H. E., Hawkes, L. M., & Long, J. R. 2003 Aging and the perception of speed. Perception, 32, 85-96.

Norman, J. F., & Wiesemann, E. Y. 2007 Aging and the perception of local surface orientation from optical patterns of shading and specular highlights. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 23-31.

Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. 2006 Binocular rivalry and surface-boundary processing. Perception, 35, 581-603.         

Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. 2003 A distributed intercortical processing of binocular rivalry: Psychophysical evidence. Perception, 32, 155-166. 

Palmer, S. E., Brooks, J. L., & Lai, K. S. 2007 The occlusion illusion: Partial modal completion or apparent distance? Perception, 36, 650-669.

Parker, A. & Alais, D. 2007 A bias for looming stimuli to predominate in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 2661-2674.

Ramachandran, V. S., & Gregory, R. L. 1991 Perceptual filling in of artificiallyinduced scotomas in human vision. Nature, 350, 699–702.

Regan, D., Erkelens, C. J. & Collewijn, H. 1986 Necessary  conditions  for  theperception of motion in depth. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 27,584–597.

Rushton, S. K., Bradshaw, M. & Warren, P. A. 2007 The pop out of scene relative object movement against retinal motion due to self-movement. Cognition, 105, 237–245.

Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. 1997 The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 3408-3413.

Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. 1990 Real world occlusion constraints and binocularrivalry. Vision Research, 30, 69–80.

Shimono, K. & Wade, N. J. 2002 Monocular alignment in different depth planes.Vision Research, 42, 1127–1135.

te Pas, S. F. & Kappers, A. M. L. 2001 First-order structure induces the curvature contrast effect. Vision Research, 41, 3829–3835.

te Pas, S. F., Rogers, B. J. & Ledgeway, T. 2000 A curvature contrast effect for stereoscopically  defined  surfaces. Current  Psychology  Letters:  Brain  Behaviour and Cognition, 1, 117–126.

Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. 1998 Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753-759.

Tsai, J. J., & Victor, J. D. 2000 Neither occlusion constraint nor binocular disparityaccounts  for  the  perceived  depth  in  the  ‘sieve  effect’. Vision  Research,  40, 2265–2276.

van Beers,R.J., Sittig,A.C. & Denier van der Gon,J.J. 1999 Integration  of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81(3), 1355–1364.

van Dam, L. C.J. & van Ee,  R. 2004 Stereoscopic matching and the apertureproblem. Perception, 33, 769–787.

van den Berg, A. V. & Brenner, E. 1994 Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading. Nature, 371, 700–702.

van Ee, R. & Schor, C. M. 2000 Unconstrained stereoscopic matching of lines.Vision Research, 40, 151–162.

Vetter, T. & Poggio, T. 2002 Symmetric 3D objects are an easy case for 2D object recognition. In C.W. Tyler(Ed.), Human symmetry perception and its computational analysis (pp. 349–359). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wales, R., & Fox, R. 1970 Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 90-94.

Wattam-Bell, J. 1996a Visual motion processing in one-month-old infants: Habituation experiments. Vision Research, 36, 1679-1685.

Wattam-Bell, J. 1996b Visual motion processing in one-month-old infants: Preferential looking experiments. Vision Research, 36, 1671-1677.

Wattam-Bell, J. 2003 Motion processing asymmetries and stereopsis in infants. Vision Research, 43, 1961-1968.

Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. 2006 Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 17507-17512.

Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595-1602.

Yonas, A. 1981 Infants’ responses to optical information for collision. In R. N. Aslin, J. R. Alberts, & M. R. Petersen (Eds.), Development of perception: Psychobiological perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 313-334). New York: Academic Press.

Yonas, A., Arterberry, M. E., & Granrud, C. E. 1987 Four-month-old infants’ sensitivity to binocular and kinetic information for three-dimensional-object shape. Child Development, 58, 910-917.

Yonas, A., Condry, K. F., & Botzet, A. M. 1995 Infants’ sensitivity to motion parallax [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36(4), S910.

Yonas, A., Granrud, C. E., & Pettersen, L. 1985 Infants’ sensitiv-ity to relative size information for distance. Developmental Psychology, 21, 161-167.

Young, M. J., Landy, M. S. & Maloney, L. T. 1993 A perturbation analysis of depthperception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision  Research,33(18), 2685–2696.

Wall, M. B. & Smith, A. T. 2008 The representation of egomotion in the human brain. Current Biology, 18, 191–194.

Wexler, M., Panerai, F., Lamouret, I. & Droulez, J. 2001 Self-motion and the　perception of stationary objects. Nature, 409(6816), 85–88.

Wurtz, R. H. 1998 Optic Flow: A brain region devoted to optic flow analysis. Current Biology, 8, 　　　R554–R556.