Albright, T. D., & Stoner, G. R. (2002). Contextual influences on visual
processing.Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 339–379.
Allman, J., Miezin, F., &
McGuinness, E. 1985 Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the
classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual
area (MT). Perception, 14, 105–126.
Andersen, G. J. 1990 Focused
attention in three-dimensional space. Perception
& Psychophysics, 47, 112-120.
Andersen, G. J., & Kramer, A. F. 1993 Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional
space. Perception & Psychophysics, 53,
658-667.
Arnott, S. R., & Shedden,
J. M. 2000 Attention switching in depth using random-dot autostereograms:
Attention gradient asymmetries. Perception
& Psychophysics, 62, 1459-1473.
Bach, M., & Meigen, T.
1992 Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregationin the human visual evoked potential. Vision Research, 32, 417–424.
Bach, M., & Meigen, T.
(1997). Similar electrophysiological correlates of texturesegregation induced by
luminance, orientation, motion and stereo. Vision
Research, 37, 1409–1414.
Bach, M., Schmitt, C.,
Quenzer, T., Meigen, T., & Fahle, M. (2000). Summation ofTexture segregation across
orientation and spatial frequency:Electrophysiological and psychophysical
findings. Vision Research,
40,3559–3566.
Bakin, J. S., Nakayama, K.,
& Gilbert, C. D. 2000 Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three
dimensional surface configurations. Journal
of Neuroscience, 20, 8188–8198.
Bar, M. 2004 Visual objects
in context. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience,
5, 617–629.
Bar, M., Kassam, K. S.,
Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., et al.2006 Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA,
103, 449–454.
Biederman, I. 1987
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
Bingham, G. P., & Pagano,
C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular
distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 145–168.
Blake,
R. 1989 A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological review, 96,145–167.
Blake, R., & Camisa, J. 1979 The inhibitory nature of
binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 5, 315–323.
Blake, R., & He, S. 2005 Visual adaptation as a tool for
studying the neural correlates of conscious visual awareness. In C. Clifford
& G. Rhodes (Eds.), Fitting the mind
to the world (pp. 281–307). Oxford University Press.
Blake, R., & Logothetis,
N. K. 2002 Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13–21.
Born, R. T. 2000
Center–surround interactions in the middle temporal visual area of the owl
monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology,
84, 2658–2669.
Born, R. T., & Bradley,
D. C. 2005 Structure and function of visual area MT. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 157–189.
Born, R. T., & Tootell,
R. B. H. 1992 Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate
middle temporal visual area. Nature,
357, 497–499.
Bonneh, Y. S., Cooperman, A.,
& Sagi, D. 2001) Motion-induced blindness in normalobservers. Nature, 411, 798–801.
Bouvier,
S. E., Cardinal, K. S., & Engel, S. A. (2008). Activity in visual area V4correlates with surface
perception. Journal of Vision, 8,
1–9.
Bradley, D. C., &
Andersen, R. A. 1998 Center–surround antagonism based on disparity in primate
area MT. Journal of Neuroscience, 18,
7552–7565.
Bradshaw, M. F., Glennerster,
A., & Rogers, B. J. 1996 The effect of display size on disparity scaling
from differential perspective and vergence cues. VisionResearch, 36, 1255–1264.
Brenner, E., & Smeets, J.
B. J. 2000 Comparing extra-retinal information about distance and direction. Vision Research, 40, 1649–1651
Bressan, P., Garlaschelli, L., & Barracano, M. 2003 Antigravity hills are visualillusions. Psychological Science, 14, 441–449.
Brooks, K. R., & Stone, L. S. (2004). Stereomotion speed perception: Contributionsfrom both changing disparity and interocular velocity difference over a range ofrelative disparities. Journal of Vision, 41, 1061–1079.
Bülthoff,
H. H., & Yuille, A. 1990 Shape-from-X: Psychophysics and computation.Proceedings of the SPIE, 1383, 165–172.
Caputo, G. 1998 Texture
brightness filling-in. Vision Research,
38, 841–851.
Caputo, G., & Casco, C.
(1999). A visual evoked potential correlate of global figure–ground segmentation. Vision Research, 39, 1597–1610.
Carlson,
T. A., & He, S. (2004). Competing global representations fail to initiatebinocular rivalry. Neuron, 43(6), 907–914.
Coello, Y., & Magne, P.
2000 Determination of target distance in a structured environment: Selection of
visual information for action. European
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 489–519.
Cornilleau-Pérès, V., Wexler,
M., Droulez, J., Marin, E., Miege, C., & Bourdoncle, B.2002 Visual
perception of planar orientation: Dominance of static depth cuesover motion cues. Vision Research, 42, 1403–1412.
Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F., & Grafton, S. T. 2006 Building
a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage, 31, 1257–1267.
de Weert, C. M. M., Snoeren, P. R., & Koning, A. 2005 Interactions
betweenbinocular rivalry and Gestalt formation. Vision Research, 45, 2571–2579.
Dijkstra, T. M., Cornilleau-Pérès, V., Gielen, C. C., &
Droulez, J. 1995 Perception of three-dimensional shape from ego- and
object-motion: Comparison between small- and large-field stimuli. Vision Research, 35, 453–462.
Di Luca, M., Domini, F., & Caudek, C. 2004 Spatial integration
in structure from
motion. Vision
Research, 44, 3001–3013.
Domini, F., & Caudek, C. 2003a Recovering slant and angular
velocity from a linearvelocity field:
Modeling and psychophysics. Vision
Research, 43, 1753–1764.
Domini, F., & Caudek, C. 2003b 3-D structure perceived from
dynamic information: A new theory. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 7, 444–449.
Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Tassinari, H. 2006 Stereo and motion
information are notindependently
processed by the visual system. Vision
Research, 46, 1707–1723.
Doniger, G. M., Foxe,
J. J., Murray, M. M., Higgins, B. A., Snodgrass, J. G., Schroeder, C.E., et al. (2000). Activation
timecourse of ventral visual stream object recognition areas: High density electrical mapping of perceptual closure
processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 615–621.
Doniger, G. M., Foxe, J. J., Schroeder, C. E., Murray, M. M.,
Higgins, B. A., & Javitt, D. C.(2001). Visual perceptual learning in human
object recognition areas: A repetition
priming study using high-density electrical mapping. NeuroImage,13, 305–313.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of
visualinformation. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual
attention between objects and
locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
123, 161-177.
Erkelens, C. J., & Collewijn, H. (1985). Motion perception
during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vision Research, 25, 583–588.
FahleF.M., Quenzer, T., Braun, C., & Spang, K. (2003). Feature-specific
electrophysiological correlates of texture
segregation. Vision Research, 43, 7–19.
Fang, F., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2009). Border ownership selectivity in humanearly visual cortex and its modulation by attention. The Journal of Neuroscience,29, 460–465.
Fantoni, C. 2008 3D surface orientation based on a novel representation of the orientation disparity field. Vision Research, 48, 2509–2522.
Fantoni, C., Caudek, C., & Domini, F. 2010 Systematic
distortions of perceived planar surface motion in
active vision. Journal of Vision,
10(5):12, 1–20.
Foley, J. M. 1977 Effect of distance information and range on two
indices of visually perceived distance. Perception,
6, 449–460.
Foley, J. M. 1980 Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87(5),411–434.
Gawryszewski, L. D. G., Riggio, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà,
C.1987 Movements of attention in three spatial dimensions and the meaning of
“neutral” cues. Neuropsychologia, 25,
19-29.
Gogel, W. 1961 Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of
objects in a binocular configuration. The Journal of Psychology, 52, 303–315.
Gogel, W., & Tietz, J. 1973 Absolute motion parallax and the
specific distance tendency.
Perception & Psychophysics, 13,
284–292.
Gogel, W. C., & McNulty,
P. 1983 Perceived velocity as a function of reference mark density.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 257–265.
Glennerster, A., Rogers, B.
J., & Bradshaw, M. F. 1998 Cues to viewing distance forstereoscopic depth
constancy. Perception, 27, 1357–1365.
Glennerster, A., Tcheang, L.,
Gilson, S. J., Fitzgibbon, A. W., & Parker, A. J. 2006 Humans ignore motion and
stereo cues in favor of a fictional stable world.Current Biology, 16, 428–432
Graf, E. W., Adams, W. J.,
& Lages, M. 2002 Modulating motion-induced blindness
Grill-Spector, K., &
Kanwisher, N. 2005 Visual recognition: As soon as you know itis there, you know what
it is. Psychological Science, 16,
152–160.
Grossberg, S., &
Mingolla, E. 1985 Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion,
illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological
Review, 92(2), 173–211.
Harrad, R. A., McKee, S. P., Blake, R., & Yang, Y. 1994
Binocular rivalry disrupts stereopsis. Perception,
23, 15–28.
Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. 1999 High-level scene
perception. Annual Review of Psychology,
50, 243–271.
Herrmann, C. S., & Bosch, V. (2001). Gestalt perception
modulates early visualprocessing. Neuroreport, 12, 901–904.
Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of
recognition. Cognition,18,65-96.
Hsu, L.-C., Yeh, S.-L., & Kramer, P. 2006 A common mechanism
for perceptual
filling-in and motion-induced blindness. Vision Research, 46, 1973–1981.
Johnston, E. B. 1991 Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. VisionResearch, 31, 1351–1360.
Koenderink, J. J. 1990 Solid shape. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England:MIT Press.
Kovács, I., Papathomas, T., Yang, M., & Feher, A. 1996 When the brain changes itsmind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences, USA, 93, 15508–15511.
Lages, M., Adams, W. J., & Graf, E. W. 2009 Motion-aftereffect-induced blindness.Journal of Vision, 9(11):11, 1–7.
Lappin, J. S., & Craft, W. D. 2000 Foundations of spatial vision: From retinal images to perceived shapes. Psychological Review, 107, 6–38.
Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. 1996
What is rivalling duringbinocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621–624
Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. 2005 Traveling waves of
activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 22–23.
Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. 2007 Hierarchy of
cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1048–1054.
Ling, S., & Blake, R. 2009 Suppression during binocular
rivalry broadens orientation tuning. Psychological
Science, 20(11), 1348–1355.
Liu, J., & Newsome, W. T.
2005 Correlation between speed perception and neural activity in the
middle temporal visual area. Journal of
Neuroscience, 25,711–722.
Marr,
D. 1982 Vision. New York: W.H.
Freeman.
Mathes, B., & Fahle, M.
(2007). The electrophysiological correlate of contour integration is similar
for color and luminance mechanisms. Psychophysiology,44, 305–322.
Mathes, B., Trenner, D., & Fahle, M. (2006). The electrophysiological correlate ofcontour integration is modulated by task demands. Brain Research, 1114,98–112.
Mon-Williams,
M., & Tresilian, J. R. (1999). Some recent studies on the extra retinal contribution to distance
perception. Perception, 28, 167–181.
Murray, M. M., Imber, M. L.,
Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2006). Boundary completion is automatic and dissociable
from shape discrimination. The Journal ofNeuroscience, 26, 12043–12054.
Murray, M. M., Wylie, G. R.,
Higgins, B. A., Javitt, D. C., Schroeder, C. E., & Foxe, J. J. (2002). The
spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: Combined high-density electrical
mapping, source analysis, and functional magneticresonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22,
5055–5073.
Nakayama, K., He, Z. J.,
& Shimojo, S. 1995 Visual surface representation: A critical link between
lower-level and higher level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson
(Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science:
Visual cognition (pp. 1–70). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Wenderoth, P. 2001 The depth
and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 348–360.
Norman, H. F., Norman, J. F., & Bilotta, J. 2000 The temporal
course of suppression during binocular rivalry. Perception, 29, 831–841.
Norman, H. F., Norman, J. F.,
Todd, J. T., & Lindsey, D. T. (1996). Spatial interactions in perceived speed. Perception, 25, 815–830.
Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. 1997 Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 72–107.
Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (1999). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role ofattention. Perception, 28(5), 551–574.
Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (2003a). A distributed intercortical processing of binocular rivalry: Psychophysical evidence. Perception, 32(2), 155–166.
Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (2003b). On the initiation and spreading of interocularsuppression from binocular vertical contours [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3(9)452, 452a. doi:10.1167/3.9.452. <http://journalofvision.org/3/9/452/>.
Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (2005). Surface representation and attention modulationmechanisms in binocular rivalry. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry(pp. 117–135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ooi,
T. L., & He, Z. J. (2006). Binocular rivalry and surface boundary
processing.Perception, 35(5), 581–603.
Orban, G. A., Saunders, R.
C., & Vandenbussche, E. (1995). Lesions of the superiortemporal cortical motion
areas impair speed discrimination in the macaque monkey. European Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2261–2276.
O’Shea,
R. P., Blackburn, S. G., & Ono, H. 1994 Contrast as a depth cue. VisionResearch, 34, 1595–1604.
Paffen, C. L. E., Naber, M.,
& Verstraten, F. A. J. 2008 The spatial origin of a perceptual transition
in binocular rivalry. PloS One, 3,
e2311.
Pagano, C. C., & Bingham,
G. P. (1998). Comparing measures of monocular distanceperception: Verbal and reaching errors are
not correlated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
and Performance,
24, 1037–1051.
Paradiso, M. A., &
Nakayama, K. 1991 Brightness perception and filling-in. Vision Research, 31, 1221–1236.
Palmer,
S. E., & Ghose, T. 2008 Extremal edges: A powerful cue to depth perception and figure–ground
organization. Psychological Science,
19, 77–84.
Pasternak, T., & Merigan,
W. H. 1994 Motion perception following lesions of the superior temporal sulcus in
the monkey. Cerebral Cortex, 4,
247–259.
Pinna, B., Brelstaff, G., & Spillmann, L. 2001 Surface color from boundaries: A newwater color illusion. Vision Research, 41, 2669–2676.
Pinna, B., Werner, J. S., & Spillmann, L. 2003 The watercolor effect: A new principle of grouping and figure–ground organization. Vision Research, 43, 43–52.
Qiu, F. T., & von der Heydt, R. 2005 Figure and ground in the visual cortex: V2 combines stereoscopic cues with Gestalt rules. Neuron, 47, 155–166.
Qiu,
F. T., & von der Heydt, R. (2007). Neural representation of transparent
overlap. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 283–284.
Raiguel, S., Van Hulle, M.
M., Xiao, D.-K., Marcar, V. L., & Orban, G. A. (1995). Shape and spatial
distribution of receptive fields and antagonistic motion surrounds in the
middle temporal area (V5) of the macaque. European
Journal of Neuroscience,7, 2064–2082.
Ramachandran, V. S. 1988a
Perception of shape from shading. Nature,
331,163–166.
Ramachandran, V. S. 1988b
Perceiving shape from shading. Scientific
American,259, 58–65.
Regan, D., Erkelens, C. J.,
& Collewijn, H. (1986). Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision
Science, 27, 584–597.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. 2004 The mirror-neuron system.
Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Rousselet, G. A., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. 2002
Parallel processing in highlevel categorization
of natural images. Nature Neuroscience,
5, 629–630.
Rousselet, G. A., Thorpe, S. J., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. 2004
Processing of one, two orfour
natural scenes in humans: The limits of parallelism. Vision Research, 44,877–894.
Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. 1994 From blobs to boundary edges:
Evidence for timeand spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological
Science, 5,195–200.
Seno, T. & Sato, T. 2009 Positional and directional
preponderances in vection.Experimental Brain Research, 192, 221–229.
Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Real world occlusion constraints
and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 30(1), 69-80.
Su, Y., Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. 2007 The speed and spreading of binocular
rivalry dominance from boundary contours. Journal of Vision, 7(9), 59 (59a, Abstract).
Su, Y., He, Z. J., & Ooi, T. L. 2009 Coexistence of binocular
integration and suppression determined by surface border information. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, USA, 106, 15990–15995.
Sugita, Y. (1999). Grouping of image fragments in primary visual
cortex. Nature, 401,269–272.
Suzuki, S., & Grabowecky, M. 2002 Evidence for perceptual
‘‘trapping” andadaptation in multistable inocular rivalry. Neuron, 36, 143–157.
Tanaka, K., Hikosaka, K.,
Saito, H., Yukie, M., Fukada, Y., & Iwai, E. (1986). Analysis of local and
wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 134–144.
Todd, J. T., & Mingolla, E. 1983 The perception of surface curvature and directionof illumination from patterns of shading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 9, 583–595.
Todd, J. T., & Bressan, P. 1990 The perception of 3-dimensional affine structurefrom minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48,419–430.
Tresilian, J. R., Mon-Williams, M., & Kelly, B. M. (1999).
Increasing confidence invergence as a cue
to distance. Proceedings of the Royal
Society London B, 266,39–44.
Tynan, P., & Sekuler, R.
(1975). Simultaneous motion contrast: Velocity, sensitivity and depth response. Vision Research, 15, 1231–1238.
van Bogaert, E. A., Ooi, T.
L., & He, Z. J. 2008 The monocular boundary contour
mechanism in binocular
surface representation and suppression. Perception,
37(8), 1197–1215.
van Boxtel, J. J. A., Wexler, M., & Droulez, J. 2003 Perception of plane orientation from self-generated and passively observed optic flow. Journal of Vision, 3(5),318–332.
van
der Zwan, R., & Wenderoth, P. (1994). Psychophysical evidence for area V2involvement in the reduction
of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocularrivalry. Visual Neuroscience,
11, 823–830.
van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., Hunnius, S., Vesper, C., &
Bekkering, H. (2008). You’ll never crawl alone: Neurophysiological evidence for
experience-dependent motor resonance in infancy. Neuroimage, 43, 808–814.
van Lier, R., & de Weert, C. 2003 Intra- and interocular
colour-specific activationduring dichoptic suppression. Vision Research,
43, 1111–1116.
Vecera, S. P., Vogel, E. K., & Woodman, G. F. 2002 Lower
region: A new cue tofigure-ground segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
131,194–205.
Viguier, A., Clément, G., & Trotter, Y. (2001). Distance perception within near visual space. Perception, 30, 115–124.
von der Heydt, R., Zhou, H., & Friedman, H. S. (2000).
Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey
visual cortex. Vision Research, 40,
1955–1967.
von der Heydt, R., Friedman, H. S., & Zhou, H. 2003 Searching
for the neural mechanisms of color filling-in. In L. Pessoa & P. De Weerd
(Eds.), Filling-in: From perceptual
completion to cortical reorganization (pp. 106–127). Oxford, UK:Oxford
University Press.
Watanabe, K., Paik, Y., & Blake, R. 2004 Preserved gain
control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research,44, 3065–3071.
Wilson, H. R., & Bergen, J. R. 1979 A four mechanism model for
threshold spatial vision.
Vision Research, 19, 19–32.
Wilson, H. R., Blake, R.,
& Lee, S. H. 2001 Dynamics of traveling waves in visual perception. Nature, 412, 907–910.
Xu, J., He, Z. J., & Ooi, T. L. 2010 Surface boundary contour strengthens imagedominance in binocular competition. Vision Research, 50, 155–170.
Zhou, H., Friedman, H. S., & von der Heydt, R. 2000 Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6594–6611.