文献（2011）

(1)Asakura,N. & Inui,T. 2011 Disambiguation of mental rotation by spatial frames of  reference. 　　 　
　　i-Perception, 2, 477-485.

(2) Baker,T.J.,Norcia,A.M. &　 Candy,T.R. 2011 Orientation tuning in the visual cortex of 3-month-old
　　human infants. Vision Research  51, 470-478.

(3) Blake,R. & Wilson,H. 2011 Binocular vision. Vision Research  51, 754-770

(4) Braddick,O. & Atkinson,J. 2011 Development of human visual function. Vision Research  51, 　　
　　1588-1609.

(5) Corrow, S,, Granrud, C. E., Mathison, J.&  Yonas, A. 2011, Six-month-old   infants perceive the
　 hollow-face illusion. Perception, 40, 1376–1383.

(6) Dearing,R.R. & Harris,L.R. 2011 The contribution of different parts of the  visual field　to　the
　　perception of upright. Vision Research  51, 2207-2215.

(7) Durgin, F. H., & Li, Z. 2011 Perceptual scale expansion: An efficient angular coding strategy for
　　　 locomotor space. Attention,Perception, & Psychophysics. 73, 1856-1870.

(8) Gillam, B. 2011  Occlusion issues in early Renaissance art. i-Perception, 2,   1076-1097.

(9) Gillam B., Palmisano, S. A.& Govan, .D G. 2011 Depth interval estimates from motion parallax
　　 and binocular disparity beyond interaction space. Perception, 40, 39–49.

(10)Guzzon,D. & Casco,C. 2011 Visual experience on texture segmentation without awareness.
　 　Vision Research  51,2509-2516.

(11)Harrison,S.J., Backus,B.T. & Jain,A. 2011 Disambiguation of Necker cube   rotation by
　　monocular and binocular depth cues: Relative effectiveness for establishin long-term bias. Vision
　　 Research  51, 978-986.

(12)Hayward.C., Truong,G., Partanen,M. & Giasch,D. 2011 Effects of speed, age, and   amblyopia on
　　 the perception of motion-defined form. Vision Research  51,  2216-2223.

(13) Kahrimanovic,M., Tiest,W.M.B. & Kappers,A.M.L. 2011 Discrimination thresholds 　for haptic
　　 perception of volume,surface area, and weight. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,73,2649-
　　2656.

(14) Kavšek,M. 2011 Infants’ responsiveness to lightness changes on a dynamic three-dimensional
　　 surface. Vision Research  51, 2398-2404.

(15) Lawson,R. & Bracken,S. 2011 Haptic object recognition: How important are depth cues and
　　 plane orientation? Perception 40, 576-597.

(16) Levi,D.M., McKee,S.P. & Movshon,J.A. 2011 Visual deficits in anisometropia. Vision Research
　　  51, 48–57.

(17) Li,Z., Phillips,J. & Durgin,F.H.2011 The underestimation of egocentric distance:evidence from
　　 frontal matching tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73,2205-2217.

(18) Matthews,H.,Hill,H. & Palmisano,S. 2011 Binocular disparity magnitude affects perceived depth
　　 magnitude despite inversion of depth order. Perception, 40, 975-988.

(19)Marlow, P.& Gillam, B. J. 2011 Stereopsis loses dominance over relative size as target　
　　separation increases. Perception, 40, 1413–1427.

(20) Meijer,F.,&  Van der Lubbe,R.H.J. 2011 Active exploration improves perceptual sensitivity for
　　 virtual 3D objects in visual recognition tasks. Vision Research  51, 2431-2439.

(21) Mitchell,M.E., Kennie,J. & Duffy,K.R. 2011 Preference for binocular concordant visual input in
　　 early postnatal development remains despite prior monocular deprivation. Vision Research  51,
　　1351-1359.

(22) Nandakumar, C., Torralba, A.&  Malik, J. 2011 How little do we need for 3-D shape perception?
　　 Perception, 40, 257–271.

(23) Norman,J.F. &  & Bartholomew,A.N.2011 Blindness enhances tactile acuity and haptic 3-D　
　　 shape discrimination. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73,2323-2331.

(24) Norman,J.F.,Kappers,A.M.L.,Beers,A.M.Scott,A.K.,Norman,H. & Koenderink,J.L. 2011 Aging
　　 and the haptic perception of 3D surface shape. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
　　 73,908-918.

(25) Oh, S. 2011 The eyeglass reversal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,    73, 1336-1343.

(26) Paffen ,C.L.E., Hooge,I.T.C., Benjamins,J.S. & Hogendoorn,H. 2011 A search asymmetry for
　　 interocular conflict. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,73,1042-1053.

(27) Pallett,Pm. &  MacLeod,D.I.A. 2011 Seeing faces as objects: no face inversion effect with
　　 geometrical discrimination. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 504-520.

(28) Plaisier,M.A. & Smeets,J.B.J. 2011  Haptic subitizing across the fingers. Attention, Perception, &
　　 Psychophysics, 73,1579-1585.

(29) Raghunandan,A. 2011 Binocular capture: The effects of spatial frequency and contrast polarity of
　　the monocular target. Vision Research, 51,2369-2377.

(30) Ritchie, K. L., Bannerman, R. L. & Sahraie, A. 2012, The effect of fear in the periphery in
　　 binocular rivalry. Perception, 40, 1395–1401.

(31) Roelfsema,P.R.& Houtkamp,R. 2011 Incremental grouping of image elements in vision. Attention
　　, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2542-2572.

(32) Rychkova,S. & Ninio,J. 2011 Alternation frequency thresholds for stereopsis as a technique for
　　exploring stereoscopic difficulties. i-Perception,2,50-68.

(33) Schofield,A.J.,Rock,P.B. & Georgeson,M.A. Sun and sky: Does human vision assume a mixture
　　 of point and diffuse illumination when interpreting shape-from-shading? Vision Research, 51,
　　2317-2330.

(34) Schenk, T., Franz,V. & Bruno, N. 2011 Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action: Which model
　　is compatible with the available psychophysical and neuropsychological data? Vision Research,
　　51, 812-818.

(35) Sridhar,D. & Bedell, H.E. 2011 Relative contributions of the two eyes to perceived egocentric
　　 visual direction in normal binocular vision. Vision Research, 51, 1075-1085.

(36) Schwaninger,A. & Yang,J. 2011 The application of 3D representations in face recognition.
　　 Vision Research  51, 969-977.

(37) Su,Y.R., He,Z.J. & Ooi,T.L. 2011 Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation
　　 through the time course of binocular rivalry. Vision Research  51, 1288-1296.

(38)Tsirlin,I., Wilcox,L.M. & Allison,R.S. 2011 Disparity biasing in depth from monocular occlusions.
　　 Vision Research  51, 1699-1711.

(39) Tsuruhara,A., Nakato,E., Otuka,Y., Kanazawa,S., Yamaguchi,M. & Hill,H. 2011 The hollow-face
　　illusion in infancy: do infants see a screen based rotating hollow mask as hollow?
　　i-Perception,2,418-427.

(40) van der Kooij,K., Domini,F.  & te Pas,S.F. 2011 Surface boundaries do not constrain a depth
　　 aftereffect. Vision Research  51, 138-146.

(41)van Doorn,A., Koenderink,J. & Wagemans, J. 2011 Rank order scaling of pictorial depth.
　　i-Perception, 2,724-744.

(42)van Mierlo ,C.M.,Brenner,E. & Smeets,J.B.J. 2011 Better performance with two eyes than with
　　 one in stereo-blind subjects’judgments of motion in depth. Vision Research,51, 1249-1253.

(43)Wagemans,J.,van Doorn,A.J. & Koenderink.J.J. 2011 Measuring 3D point configurations in
　　 pictorial space. i-Perception, 2, 77–111.

(44)Wagemans,J.,van Doorn,A.J. & Koenderink.J.J. 2011 Pictorial depth probed through relative
　　sizes. i-Perception, 2, 992-1013.

(45) Wandell,B.A. & Winawer,J. 2011 Imaging retinotopic maps in the human brain.  Vision Research
 　　51, 718-737.

(46) Westheimer,G 2011 Path dissociation of visual signals entering the cortex: Disparity, contour
　　 orientation and position. Vision Research  51, 1058-1063.

(47)Westwood,D.A. & Goodale,M.A. 2011 Converging evidence for diverging pathways:
　　Neuropsychology and psychophysics tell the same story. Vision Research, 51,804-811.

(48)Zannoli,M. & Mamassian,P. 2011 The role of transparency in da Vinci stereopsis. Vision
　　Research, 51, 2186-2197.

(49)Zhaoping,L. & Meng,G. 2011 Dichoptic completion, rather than binocular rivalry or binocular 　
　　summation. i-Perception, 2, 611–614.