文献(2012)

(1)Aaen-Stockdale,C., Ledgeway,T., McGraw,P. &  Hess,R. F. 2012 Interaction of first-
   and second-order signals in the extraction of global-motion and optic-flow. Vision
   Research, 68, 28-39.

(2)Anstis,S. & Rogers,B. 2012  Binocular fusion of luminance, color, motion and flicker. Two eyes
  are worse than one. Vision Research, 52, 47-53.

(3)Aytekin,M & Rucci,M. 2012 Motion parallax from microscopic head movements during  
   visual fixation. Vision Research, 70, 7-17.

(4)Baker,D.H. & Meese,T.S. 2012 Interocular transfer of spatial adaptation is weak at
   low spatial frequencies. Vision Research, 63,81-87.

(5)Buckthought,A. & Mendola,J.D. 2012 How simultaneous is the perception of binocular   
   depth and rivalry in plaid stimuli? i-Perception,3, 305–315.

(6)Chopin,A., Mamassian,P.& Blake,R. 2012 Stereopsis and binocular rivalry are based
   on perceived rather than physical orientations. Vision Research, 63,63-68.

(7)Higashiyam,A. & Shimono,K. 2012 Apparent depth of pictures reflected by a mirror:  
   The plastic effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1522-1532.

(8)Hunt,J.J., Mattingley,J.B.&  Goodhill,G.J. 2012 Randomly oriented edge
   arrangements dominate naturalistic arrangements in binocular rivalry. Vision  Research, 64, 49-55.

(9)Khuu,S.K. & Khambiye,S.2012 The influence of shape-from-shading information on the   
   perception of global motion. Vision Research, 52,1-10.

(10)Konkle,T. & Oliva,A. 2012 A Familiar-Size Stroop Effect:Real-World Size Is an
   Automatic Property of Object Representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology  Human   
  Perception and Performance,38,561-569.

(11)Li,Z. & Durgin,F.H. 2012 A comparison of two theories of perceived distance on the
    ground plane: The angular expansion hypothesis and the intrinsic bias hypothesis.   
   i-Perception,3,368-383.

(12) Marlow, P. 2011 Surface edges mitigate the disparity gradient constraint on
    binocular fusion and visual direction. Vision Research, 52, 38-46.

(13)Matthews, H., Hill, H. & Palmisano, S. 2012, Independent effects of local and global  
    binocular disparity on the perceived convexity of stereoscopically presented faces  in scenes.
  Perception, 41,168–174.

(14)Nawrot,M. &  Stroyan,K. 2012 Integration time for the perception of depth from
    motion parallax. Vision Research, 59,64-71.

(15)Norman,J.F.,Holmin,J.S., Beers,A.M., Cheeseman, J.R.,Ronning,C., Stethen,A.G. &  
    Frost,A.L. 2012 Aging and the discrimination of 3-D shape from motion and binocular  
  disparity.74,1512-1521.

(16)Scherzer,T.R. & Ekroll,V. 2012  Occlusion improves the interpolation of sampled motion. Vision
  Research, 62, 17-25.

(17)Silveira,S.,Graupmann,V.,Frey,D.,Blautzik,J.,Meindl,T.,Reiser,M.,Chen,C.,Wang,Y.,Bao,Y.,Pöppel,E.
  & Gutyrchik,E. 2012  Matching reality in the arts: Self-referential neural processing of
   naturalistic compared to surrealistic images. Perception,41,569-576.

(18)Sridhar,D. & Bedell,H.E. 2012 Binocular retinal image differences influence eye-position signals
   for perceived visual direction. Vision Research, 62, 220-227.

(19)van Doorn,A.J.,Koenderink,J.J.,Leyssen,M.H.R. & Wagemans,J. 2012 Interaction of    
  depth probes and style of depiction. i-Perception,3,528-540.

(20)Yamashita,W., Kanazawa,S. & Yamaguchi,M.K. 2012 The effect of gaze direction on   
  three-dimensional face recognition in infants. Vision Research,68,14-18.