文献(2012)
(1)Aaen-Stockdale,C., Ledgeway,T., McGraw,P. & Hess,R. F. 2012
Interaction of first-
and second-order signals in the extraction of global-motion and optic-flow. Vision
Research, 68, 28-39.
(2)Anstis,S. & Rogers,B. 2012 Binocular fusion of luminance,
color, motion and flicker. Two eyes
are worse than one. Vision Research, 52, 47-53.
(3)Aytekin,M & Rucci,M. 2012 Motion parallax from microscopic head
movements during
visual fixation. Vision Research, 70, 7-17.
(4)Baker,D.H. & Meese,T.S. 2012 Interocular transfer of spatial adaptation is weak at
low spatial frequencies. Vision Research, 63,81-87.
(5)Buckthought,A. & Mendola,J.D. 2012 How simultaneous is the perception
of binocular
depth and rivalry in plaid stimuli? i-Perception,3, 305–315.
(6)Chopin,A., Mamassian,P.& Blake,R. 2012 Stereopsis and binocular
rivalry are based
on perceived rather than physical orientations. Vision Research,
63,63-68.
(7)Higashiyam,A. & Shimono,K. 2012 Apparent depth of pictures reflected
by a mirror:
The plastic effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
74, 1522-1532.
(8)Hunt,J.J., Mattingley,J.B.& Goodhill,G.J. 2012 Randomly oriented
edge
arrangements dominate naturalistic arrangements in binocular
rivalry. Vision Research, 64, 49-55.
(9)Khuu,S.K. & Khambiye,S.2012 The influence of shape-from-shading information on the
perception of global motion. Vision Research, 52,1-10.
(10)Konkle,T. & Oliva,A. 2012 A Familiar-Size Stroop Effect:Real-World Size Is an
Automatic Property of Object Representation. Journal of Experimental
Psychology Human
Perception and Performance,38,561-569.
(11)Li,Z. & Durgin,F.H. 2012 A comparison of two theories of perceived
distance on the
ground plane: The angular expansion hypothesis and the intrinsic
bias hypothesis.
i-Perception,3,368-383.
(12) Marlow, P. 2011 Surface edges mitigate the disparity gradient constraint
on
binocular fusion and visual direction. Vision Research, 52,
38-46.
(13)Matthews, H., Hill, H. & Palmisano, S. 2012, Independent effects
of local and global
binocular disparity on the perceived convexity of stereoscopically
presented faces in scenes.
Perception, 41,168–174.
(14)Nawrot,M. & Stroyan,K. 2012 Integration time for the perception of depth from
motion parallax. Vision Research, 59,64-71.
(15)Norman,J.F.,Holmin,J.S., Beers,A.M., Cheeseman, J.R.,Ronning,C., Stethen,A.G. &
Frost,A.L. 2012 Aging and the discrimination of 3-D shape from motion and binocular
disparity.74,1512-1521.
(16)Scherzer,T.R. & Ekroll,V. 2012 Occlusion improves the interpolation of sampled motion. Vision
Research, 62, 17-25.
(17)Silveira,S.,Graupmann,V.,Frey,D.,Blautzik,J.,Meindl,T.,Reiser,M.,Chen,C.,Wang,Y.,Bao,Y.,Pöppel,E.
& Gutyrchik,E. 2012 Matching reality in the arts: Self-referential neural processing of
naturalistic compared to surrealistic images. Perception,41,569-576.
(18)Sridhar,D. & Bedell,H.E. 2012 Binocular retinal image differences
influence eye-position signals
for perceived visual direction. Vision Research, 62, 220-227.
(19)van Doorn,A.J.,Koenderink,J.J.,Leyssen,M.H.R. & Wagemans,J. 2012
Interaction of
depth probes and style of depiction. i-Perception,3,528-540.
(20)Yamashita,W., Kanazawa,S. & Yamaguchi,M.K. 2012 The effect of gaze
direction on
three-dimensional face recognition in infants. Vision Research,68,14-18.